翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles ・ Immigration and Nationality ・ Immigration and Nationality Act ・ Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ・ Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 ・ Immigration and Nationality Act Section 287(g) ・ Immigration and Nationality Directorate ・ Immigration and Nationality Law Review ・ Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act ・ Immigration and Naturalisation Service (Netherlands) ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Doherty ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr ・ Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stevic ・ Immigration and Protection Tribunal ・ Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada ・ Immigration and Refugee Protection Act ・ Immigration Appellate Authority ・ Immigration Bridge ・ Immigration by country ・ Immigration consultant ・ Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council ・ Immigration Control Platform ・ Immigration Daily Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado ： ウィキペディア英語版 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado ''Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado'', , was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the restrictions placed on government officials by the Fourth Amendment applied to “factory sweeps” by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), in particular two factory sweeps conducted in January and September 1977.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/swulr15&div=24&g_sent=1&collection=journals )〕 During these sweeps, INS agents surveyed the Southern California Davis Pleating Co. in search of illegal alien workers. The agents were acting in accordance with two warrants. Neither of these warrants identified any particular individuals, but showed probable cause that there may be a number of aliens working on the premises. Workers were systematically questioned to determine their citizenship status and asked to produce their immigration papers if their answers were not satisfactory. Agents were stationed at the doors, though there is no record of whether this was meant to restrain the workers in question or merely to ensure that everyone was properly questioned. Four of the employees questioned filed actions against the INS in 1978, arguing that the sweeps violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and their right to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am4 )〕 The case hinged not on whether the search was reasonable or there was probable cause for a seizure of the workforce, but whether a seizure took place at all, and therefore whether the protections of the Fourth Amendment applied. () The Court held that the survey of the factory was instead an instance of “mere questing”; the Court has adopted, as a rule, the theory that not every interaction between police or government officials and citizens qualifies as a search or seizure, and that officials can approach and speak with people so long as the interaction is clearly consensual.() The decision therefore depended largely on whether the presence of INS agents at the doors of the factory, and the manner in general with which the workers were approached and questioned, were truly consensual or included acts of restraint or coercion.() ==Background== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.